If the first casualty of war is truth, surely it is also a victim of the partisan divide now infecting the national debate surrounding Coronavirus. “Facts are stubborn things”, said John Adams, and the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan expounded with, “You’re entitled to your opinion, you’re just not entitled to your own facts.” Allow me to suggest that truthful assessment does not focus only on those facts that support a preconceived conclusion—while covering up or ignoring those that don’t. Sound analysis, indeed honest journalism, requires us to look at the totality of the information available, something sorely lacking in our civil discourse around the coronavirus, and the full impact of the proposed remedies now under consideration.
What follows are some examples of “the rest of the story…”
American deaths “related to” coronavirus now exceed 40,000, or just over that of a typical flu season, a death rate of 122 souls per million of population, far lower than 12 other industrialized nations. As a result of our shutdown to “flatten the curve”, an estimated 22 million Americans have been made unemployed, the most in history, or about 15% of the working population, up from the 50-year low of 3.5% just 8 weeks ago. To offset this shock to our system, over $2.2 trillion was just added to our national debt in a single week.
In an interview on The Story with Martha MacCallum last week, author Bill Bennett explained that “…when you ‘convulse the economy’, you have fatalities as a result. It’s estimated that for every 1% increase in unemployment, you experience 10,000 suicides. Let’s say it’s only 5000 suicides. That means we’re looking at 75,000 people. That doesn’t count deaths from alcoholism, opioids, child abuse, domestic violence, and the loss of an economy and (22) million jobs…” On Thursday evening, Dr. Phil echoed those concerns saying, “…the fallout from this is going to last for years because people’s lives are being destroyed…”
Last week, Indiana’s Family and Social Services Administration announced that calls to the State’s Mental Health and Suicide Prevention hotline had gone from about 1000 to 25,000 per day, with the primary concerns being loss of a job, estrangement from family, or relapse into alcohol abuse or addiction of some kind—due to the stresses imposed by the government’s response to coronavirus.
With those job losses comes eviction, homelessness, and hunger. Food Banks around the country have seen dramatic spikes in demand, lines of cars stretching for many blocks, and the heads of those charities are telling reporters that 50% of those in line are using a food bank for the first time, with many of them having volunteered there on behalf of others in the past.
According to this report from PBS, our CDC doesn’t consider someone “recovered” from coronavirus until after they are both symptom-free, and have passed two negative tests, separated by more than 24 hours. Now we know why the U.S. has so many active cases on their website. Hospitals simply haven’t had enough tests to devote three tests per patient; the first one that positively diagnosed them, and two negative tests upon discharge and again days later. Most patients have no desire to go back to the hospital, or to set up an office visit with their primary care physician, merely to satisfy the CDC‘s requirements. They know they’re healed; they are symptom-free, and they’ve had a negative test to prove it. And hospitals and doctor’s offices, short on tests, are preserving their supply of tests for the elderly and at-risk patients still walking into their emergency rooms.
Three months after the first U.S. case of coronavirus, we now know that your odds of contracting the infection are 0.090% in New Hampshire. If you do contract the virus, you have a 98% chance of recovering—and that’s according to the CDC’s second negative test standard just described above. Were they to declare you recovered after just one negative test and no symptoms, those odds rise to 99.92%.
For months now, our collective angst around U.S. cases of coronavirus has been caused or reinforced by the now-infamous map of the Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 Dashboard. While one was always able to go to the site and zoom in on that map, news outlets rarely did, showing it from a distance and fueling the pandemic panic that made it appear as though the entire country was bathed in bloody, imminent death. (See below)
This week, JHU announced the release of a new county-by-county map that shows a much truer picture of American rates of infection. Notice any difference? And this new map is showing our country at “peak” cases, whereas the older map has looked like that going back many weeks.
The government’s forgivable loan program, the Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP), is already out of money in less than a week. At this writing, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is refusing to call the House back to Washington until there’s agreement that, among other partisan demands, fully half of the new top-off money going into the PPP must go to female and minority-owned businesses. What about the females and the minorities who work for other businesses, you ask? The first round of funding was available on a first-come, first-served basis, regardless of whether you were male, female, minority, or white. Pelosi now wants any new money distributed, not based on need and merit, but on gender and skin color. So: If you’re African American, Native American, Hispanic, or female—but you have the misfortune of working for a white male business owner—your paycheck will not be protected under the Paycheck Protection Plan, exactly the opposite of what Pelosi claims to intend. What tragic stupidity.
And then we have Michigan’s governor, Gretchen Whitmer. On April 8th, after the Michigan legislature voted down her request for a dubious 70-day extension of her statewide emergency authority (it now expires at the end of this month), she doubled down on her already restrictive stay-at-home order, telling her residents that if they were caught traveling to their cabins (within the state of Michigan) for a week or two of canoeing, grilling and continued self-quarantine, that they would face steep fines and arrests for “reckless endangerment.” Her rationale was that if that couple was infected, asymptomatic, and happened to stop at a gas station or a general store near their cabin, that they ran the risk of infecting that entire rural community, and overwhelming the medical system and the typically smaller community hospital nearby. In addition, she also ordered the closure or the roping off of “nonessential” parts of certain stores. Under Whitmer’s illogic, you could go to the pharmacy section of your local Target to buy Tylenol, make-up, and even hair coloring for those overdue roots—but you couldn’t go into the home and garden section to buy paint, grass seed, or propane for the grill.
This is the type of bureaucratic overreach and governmental micromanagement that seems so arbitrary and illogical to most Americans. We value our freedoms and our rights, and don’t take kindly to having those curtailed or suspended, hence the massive protests that Whitmer experienced of over 14,000 Michiganders who’ve now had enough. When you consider that seven other Midwestern governors have not issued mandatory stay-at-home orders—and their states’ infection rates are entirely under control—Whitmer’s onerous edicts stand in stark contrast to the temperance of her more restrained peers.
In summary, much of this has been underreported or misreported by the mainstream media. The focus has been on the pandemic, often rightly so, to the exclusion of any reporting on the collateral damage being done to the millions of other lives affected, the precedent-setting assault on our freedoms and rights, or the specious justifications for the restrictions we’re being asked to accept. As those 14,000 Michigan protestors made clear for all to hear, the dangers posed by a government that advocates a loss of freedoms in the name of limited security, far outweigh the dangers of a highly survivable virus that you have such a small chance of catching.
Coming soon: Coronavirus, the 2020 Deficit, and the National Debt